Our New Articles
Child Porn, Child Porn & Protections
by Tonya J. Thomas
In the new computer age there are renewed issues of pornography and especially child protection against that which is considered to be morally repugnant use of children and sexuality for perverse adult pleasure. And with good reason, in the United States, child pornography is illegal. Recent legislation has arisen with the advent of the internet and World Wide Web of home computers and e-business which is electronic commerce. The Child Online Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. 231 note, ("COPA"), as amended, established a temporary, 19-person Commission to study methods and technologies to help reduce access by minors to material on the World Wide Web that is harmful to minors. On April 16, 2002, the Supreme Court in a 6-3 decision struck down the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (or more precisely, upheld the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' 1999 First Amendment objection to it) on the grounds that it was "unconstitutionally vague and far-reaching." This decision does not affect laws prohibiting actual child pornography.
Currently, Child Abduction Prevention Act and the Child Obscenity and Pornography Prevention Act of 2003, Violence Against Children Act of 2003, and Video Voyeurism Prevention Act of 2003. Still other similar legislation such as Lifetime Consequences for Sex Offenders Act of 2003 and most importantly Child Obscenity and Pornography Prevention Act of 2003 are currently introduced in the House are meant to strengthen penalties for those convicted of crimes against children and issues of pornography as a strategy to reconstruct the 2002 laws that were held to be unconstitutional. This is primarily due to efforts on the part of Attorney General Ashcroft. We will continue to look to the Courts as the only true guide to defining what is or is not considered to be obscene or decent in the United States while maintaining our closely held views of morality in the age of the internet. But, does this serve the children's interests? Obviously, as adults we have established what we will and will not tolerate personally in our everyday life and the Courts will continue to establish the legal limits which we can entertain such notions. Law enforcement, of course, will continue to enforce these legal limits. These laws that serve to guide us on matters of obscenity are simply a continuation on the reasonable test of normal persons. It does seem to be an improvement in efforts to protect children but there is further room for improvement in the United States on this matter.
These articles on lifestyle and more
Return to the selection of child porn
You may want to try these websites for additional information
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/02/07/kids.online.porn.ap/index.html
http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2006-01-21-n89.html
http://www.thecpac.com/stop-it.html
The information provided in this article is the express opinion of the author. Exchangenet is not responsible for the content!
In the new computer age there are renewed issues of pornography and especially child protection against that which is considered to be morally repugnant use of children and sexuality for perverse adult pleasure. And with good reason, in the United States, child pornography is illegal. Recent legislation has arisen with the advent of the internet and World Wide Web of home computers and e-business which is electronic commerce. The Child Online Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. 231 note, ("COPA"), as amended, established a temporary, 19-person Commission to study methods and technologies to help reduce access by minors to material on the World Wide Web that is harmful to minors. On April 16, 2002, the Supreme Court in a 6-3 decision struck down the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (or more precisely, upheld the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' 1999 First Amendment objection to it) on the grounds that it was "unconstitutionally vague and far-reaching." This decision does not affect laws prohibiting actual child pornography.
Currently, Child Abduction Prevention Act and the Child Obscenity and Pornography Prevention Act of 2003, Violence Against Children Act of 2003, and Video Voyeurism Prevention Act of 2003. Still other similar legislation such as Lifetime Consequences for Sex Offenders Act of 2003 and most importantly Child Obscenity and Pornography Prevention Act of 2003 are currently introduced in the House are meant to strengthen penalties for those convicted of crimes against children and issues of pornography as a strategy to reconstruct the 2002 laws that were held to be unconstitutional. This is primarily due to efforts on the part of Attorney General Ashcroft. We will continue to look to the Courts as the only true guide to defining what is or is not considered to be obscene or decent in the United States while maintaining our closely held views of morality in the age of the internet. But, does this serve the children's interests? Obviously, as adults we have established what we will and will not tolerate personally in our everyday life and the Courts will continue to establish the legal limits which we can entertain such notions. Law enforcement, of course, will continue to enforce these legal limits. These laws that serve to guide us on matters of obscenity are simply a continuation on the reasonable test of normal persons. It does seem to be an improvement in efforts to protect children but there is further room for improvement in the United States on this matter.
These articles on lifestyle and more
Copyright Tonya J. Thomas child porn
Return to the selection of child porn
You may want to try these websites for additional information
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/02/07/kids.online.porn.ap/index.html
http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2006-01-21-n89.html
http://www.thecpac.com/stop-it.html
The information provided in this article is the express opinion of the author. Exchangenet is not responsible for the content!