Our New Articles
Columbus Schools, Columbus Schools Won’t See Vote In 2007
by Patricia Hawke
Voters in the Columbus Schools area who were hoping to see a ballot initiative in November will be disappointed. The Campaign for Ohio’s Future, a group made up of 12 separate educational groups, simply ran out of time to collect all the signatures needed to put their proposal on the 2007 November ballot. Supporters in the Columbus Schools had hoped that the proposal would shift financial obligations from the local community to the state, and improve the quality of public education.
Over 400,000 signatures were required; the group managed to collect 150,000 before deciding to put the program on the back burner. They say they will try again in 2008. But not everyone in Columbus Schools, or in Ohio, supports the proposal. One of the most notable opponents is Ohio Governor Ted Strickland. The Governor is seeking legislative methods to fix the problems of Ohio and Columbus Schools. Still, the disappointment felt by many in the Columbus Schools, and its surrounding communities, is apparent.
Bob Greenwood, superintendent of the East Guernsey district, about 80 miles east of Columbus Schools, has said, “It is very disappointing. We just had $8 million of cuts to balance our budget and are to the point where we can’t cut anymore.” This is concerning as Ohio and Columbus Schools strive to meet national mandates and stretch state funds. Ohio is currently 9th in the nation for graduation rates, and 15th in terms of teacher pay. Columbus Schools benefit from the $8,963 per pupil expenditure that places the state 16th highest in student spending.
Educators in Columbus Schools realize that in terms of national standards they are at the better end of the continuum, in terms of available funds. But administrators in Columbus Schools are well aware that that doesn’t mean the funds are enough, or even that money alone can address all of the issues. Governor Strickland, the Ohio Business Roundtable, and the Ohio Education Association are trying to create different legislative initiatives to fix Ohio and Columbus Schools. Local districts like Columbus Schools are hopeful that their input will be sought before final decisions are made. The issue of transferring the major burden of funding from local taxpayers in Columbus Schools to the state has numerous ramifications. It pits Columbus Schools and other Ohio districts against each in competition for the funds. But this is not unusual in the world of public education funding.
One of the biggest trends nationally is for large corporations to fund public school systems. So it’s not surprising that part of the Governor’s team includes an Ohio business organization. Columbus Schools and the other districts in Ohio will wait for both the Governor’s proposal, and to see if the Campaign for Ohio’s Future will present their proposal in 2008.
About The Author: Patricia Hawke is a staff writer for Schools K-12, providing free, in-depth reports on all U.S. public and private K-12 schools. For more information please visit http://www.schoolsk-12.com/Ohio/Columbus/index.html
These articles on lifestyle and more
Return to the selection of columbus schools
You may want to try these articles on columbus schools
Columbus Schools, Columbus Schools Conduct Partnership Programs That Aid Students by Stacy Andell Approximately 562 Words
Columbus Schools, Columbus Schools’ Partnership Program Offers A Variety Of Programs For Students by Stacy Andell Approximately 546 Words
Columbus Schools, Columbus Schools’ Innovative Partnership Programs Continue To Succeed by Stacy Andell Approximately 670 Words
You may want to try these websites for additional information
http://www.greatschools.net/city/Columbus/KS
http://www.greatschools.net/city/Columbus/MT
http://www.greatschools.net/modperl/browse_school/oh/1705
The information provided in this article is the express opinion of the author. Exchangenet is not responsible for the content!
Voters in the Columbus Schools area who were hoping to see a ballot initiative in November will be disappointed. The Campaign for Ohio’s Future, a group made up of 12 separate educational groups, simply ran out of time to collect all the signatures needed to put their proposal on the 2007 November ballot. Supporters in the Columbus Schools had hoped that the proposal would shift financial obligations from the local community to the state, and improve the quality of public education.
Over 400,000 signatures were required; the group managed to collect 150,000 before deciding to put the program on the back burner. They say they will try again in 2008. But not everyone in Columbus Schools, or in Ohio, supports the proposal. One of the most notable opponents is Ohio Governor Ted Strickland. The Governor is seeking legislative methods to fix the problems of Ohio and Columbus Schools. Still, the disappointment felt by many in the Columbus Schools, and its surrounding communities, is apparent.
Bob Greenwood, superintendent of the East Guernsey district, about 80 miles east of Columbus Schools, has said, “It is very disappointing. We just had $8 million of cuts to balance our budget and are to the point where we can’t cut anymore.” This is concerning as Ohio and Columbus Schools strive to meet national mandates and stretch state funds. Ohio is currently 9th in the nation for graduation rates, and 15th in terms of teacher pay. Columbus Schools benefit from the $8,963 per pupil expenditure that places the state 16th highest in student spending.
Educators in Columbus Schools realize that in terms of national standards they are at the better end of the continuum, in terms of available funds. But administrators in Columbus Schools are well aware that that doesn’t mean the funds are enough, or even that money alone can address all of the issues. Governor Strickland, the Ohio Business Roundtable, and the Ohio Education Association are trying to create different legislative initiatives to fix Ohio and Columbus Schools. Local districts like Columbus Schools are hopeful that their input will be sought before final decisions are made. The issue of transferring the major burden of funding from local taxpayers in Columbus Schools to the state has numerous ramifications. It pits Columbus Schools and other Ohio districts against each in competition for the funds. But this is not unusual in the world of public education funding.
One of the biggest trends nationally is for large corporations to fund public school systems. So it’s not surprising that part of the Governor’s team includes an Ohio business organization. Columbus Schools and the other districts in Ohio will wait for both the Governor’s proposal, and to see if the Campaign for Ohio’s Future will present their proposal in 2008.
About The Author: Patricia Hawke is a staff writer for Schools K-12, providing free, in-depth reports on all U.S. public and private K-12 schools. For more information please visit http://www.schoolsk-12.com/Ohio/Columbus/index.html
These articles on lifestyle and more
Reprint this article free of charge as long as you keep the author's resource box or bio intact and the links active. A copy of the ezine or URL of the page where the article was reprinted emailed to the author would be very much appreciated. columbus schools
Return to the selection of columbus schools
You may want to try these articles on columbus schools
Columbus Schools, Columbus Schools Conduct Partnership Programs That Aid Students by Stacy Andell Approximately 562 Words
Columbus Schools, Columbus Schools’ Partnership Program Offers A Variety Of Programs For Students by Stacy Andell Approximately 546 Words
Columbus Schools, Columbus Schools’ Innovative Partnership Programs Continue To Succeed by Stacy Andell Approximately 670 Words
You may want to try these websites for additional information
http://www.greatschools.net/city/Columbus/KS
http://www.greatschools.net/city/Columbus/MT
http://www.greatschools.net/modperl/browse_school/oh/1705
The information provided in this article is the express opinion of the author. Exchangenet is not responsible for the content!